aad

ch

Saturday, December 30, 2017

Why Garfield Go is better than Pokémon Go

Why Garfield Go is better than Pokémon Go
Garfield Go is a game that was released and it seems no one talks about it; I have yet to find another player. Pokemon Go of course was a huge hit at release, but from my observations, seems to have fallen out of favor with most. I personally don’t play it much nowadays, especially now that I am out of school, which is where all my pokestops were. But I have been playing Garfield Go, and I would even go as far to say it is a better game. Here's why:
One, the game loads in a reasonable amount of time. All the graphical detail in Pokemon Go perhaps makes the game look better, but it loads super slow, particularly on an older phone. The graphics in Garfield Go are much simpler, so the game loads much quicker. Garfield also doesn’t have the issue where pokestops take forever to load.
Two, the roles of item preparation and play are reversed. Pokemon Go, unless you are lucky enough to have a pokestop within the reach of your home, requires you to travel to get pokeballs and supplies. In Garfield Go, you can stay in your home and collect supplies; it is only when you want to use the supplies to get rewards that you need to travel. This arrangement makes for a better game in my opinion, as I can do more play on wifi versus on data.

Three, there are real prizes. After essentially everyone I knew quit Pokemon Go, it began to seem like a waste of time to me. After all, one of the biggest motivators to me is to be the best, like no one ever was. But if no one else is competing, it's not much of a motivator. Garfield Go, on the other hand, is motivating because it has real rewards. So far, I have only gotten $5 on Amazon from it, but hey, that’s more than than most games I play have paid me.
Four, the gameplay itself is comical in both a good way and a bad way. It's very difficult to aim the donuts in the donut toss. Also, Garfield Says is perhaps the worst minigame of all time. It is super slow paced. And while it isn’t difficult perse, it isn’t fun either. I get tired of the game long before I forget the pattern.  When you reach a coin, it starts a little mini game where you need to put food in Garfield’s bowl and he will show you where the treasure chest is. The aiming used to be very bad, but is now just slightly bad. When you would miss, Garfield would put his hands on his head and shake it in shame at you.

So in short, maybe you should check out this game, get some Garfield coins or something.

Tuesday, December 5, 2017

More UBI

This blog seems like it is becoming about UBI, but hey, its an important topic.




 Also, in other news, I just noticed there is another blog has a very similar name to mine randompwn.

Sunday, October 1, 2017

UBI on planet Money

As I'm sure my few readers know, I love the idea on UBI. So whenever a big media source reports on it, I like to share it here. Check it out.

http://www.npr.org/sections/money/2017/09/22/552850245/episode-796-the-basic-income-experiment

Stay up to date, I'm working on some big things, including a book!

Wednesday, April 19, 2017

Space Product Idea

I love space, and when Mars one was announced I thought it was a crazy idea. Kind of cool in a way, but crazy. A few weeks ago Elon Musk announced plans for trips to Mars ( I wrote this a long time ago). And it was cool. But, I learned something important about myself. As much as I love space, I wouldn't want to be one of the first people on Mars or probably ever. Dying in space would suck.  And then I got a product idea. I don't want to be in space. At least not personally, but won't it be cool to control something in space? Now that would be interesting. The idea is a small spacecraft that people rent. They can fly it around, control the camera, etc. All for a very low price.

Another idea is controlling rover's on the moon. Drive them around, it's all good.



Now, there would have to be some restrictions on what the rockets could do. Like flying them into earth could be a problem. Or trying to hit satellites with them. So the spacecraft would have to have measures installed to prevent self destructive behaviors like this.

I think Elon is moving in the wrong direction for another reason. He wants to send people to Mars, when it reality sending robots is a much better idea. Think about it, humans need heat, breathable air, food, radiation resistance, and die so easy. Robots in the other hand really just need power. They are replaceable. And in theory, you may be able to make more of them on site.  I think building a sustainable colony for Robots is a better first step